Term Paper Format
Recommendations
here are based on the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. It
is important to note, however, that individual instructors and
institutions or departments may vary from these recommendations
somewhat and that it is always wise to consult with your instructor
before formatting and submitting your work.
Paper:
Use white,
twenty-pound, 81/2- by 11-inch paper. Erasable paper tends to smudge
and should be avoided for a final draft. If you prefer to use erasable
paper in the preparation of your paper, submit a good photocopy to
your instructor.
Margins:
Except for page
numbers (see below), leave one-inch margins all around the text of
your paper -- left side, right
side,
and top and bottom.
Paragraphs should be indented half an inch; set-off quotations should
be indented an inch from the left margin (five spaces and ten spaces,
respectively, on standard typewriters).
Spacing:
The MLA Guide says
that "the research paper must be double-spaced," including quotations,
notes, and the list of works cited.
Heading and Title:
Your research paper
does not need a title page. At the top of the first page, at the
left-hand margin, type your name, your instructor's name, the course
name and number, and the date -- all on separate, doublespaced lines.
Then double-space again and center the title above your text. (If your
title requires more than one line, double-space between the lines.)
Double-space again before beginning your text. The title should be
neither underlined nor written in all capital letters. Capitalize only
the first, last, and principal words of the title. Titles might end
with a question mark or an exclamation mark if that is appropriate,
but not in a period. Titles written in other languages are capitalized
and punctuated according to different rules, and writers should
consult the MLA Guide or their instructors.
Page Numbers:
Number your pages
consecutively throughout the manuscript (including the first page) in
the upper righthand corner of each page, one-half inch from the top.
Type your last name before the page number. Most word processing
programs provide for a "running head," which you can set up as you
create the format for the paper, at the same time you are establishing
things like the one-inch margins and the double-spacing. This feature
makes the appearance and consistency of the page numbering a great
convenience. Make sure the page-number is always an inch from the
right-hand edge of the paper (flush with the right-hand margin of your
text) and that there is a double-space between the page number and the
top line of text. Do not use the abbreviation p. or any other mark
before the page number.
Tables and Figures:
Tables should be
labeled "Table," given an arabic numeral, and captioned (with those
words flush to the lefthand margin). Other material such as
photographs, images, charts, and line-drawings should be labeled
"Figure" and be properly numbered and captioned.
Binders:
Generally, the
simpler the better. Why spend money on gimmicky, unwieldy, slippery
binders, when instructors prefer nice, flat stacks of papers they can
stuff into their briefcases and backpacks? A simple staple in the
upper left-hand corner of your paper should suffice, although the MLA
Guide suggests that a paper clip can be removed and this facilitates
reading (which suggests to us that it's been a long time since the
people at MLA have had to deal with stacks of student papers). Your
instructors or their departments may have their own rules about
binders, and you should consult with them about this matter
Outline
This section on
planning combines the "bones" of your thesis or question with the
"flesh" from your research and insights to construct a unified essay
body.
An outline is the
organizational plan for your paper. You know your starting point: your
introduction and thesis/research question. You know your destination:
some sort of summative and thoughtful conclusion. But how are you
going to get from one to the other? What's your vehicle? See, an
outline doesn't just help you articulate what you plan to say, but
also how you're going to move from supporting paragraph to supporting
paragraph, how you're going to get where you want to go.
The importance of
outlines:
·
if
you can't articulate your paper even in point form, you won't be able
to do it effectively in prose and it will take you much longer to
write an inferior draft
·
if
you do find structural problems or gaps as you outline, it's easier to
fix them now than to try and totally revamp a 3rd draft. Face it, it's
always easier (translation: less intellectually painful) to scrap a
note than a paragraph or whole essay
·
any
teacher will tell you that you will lose more points for lack of
substance than for lack of writing style; outlines are all about the
crux and direction of substance
·
should things click into place, an outline gives you confidence. It
helps you to realize that, yes, you really do know what you're talking
about!
·
stream-of-consciousness writing can be published and fascinating as
creative writing, but not as a research paper. Markers don't
appreciate mental diarrhea or what Kevin B. Bucknall from Griffith
University calls The Shotgun Technique: "This is putting down
everything you know about the subject, and is a common fault. It is
like firing a shotgun and hoping that some of the many pellets hit
home." So have some respect for your readers
·
outlines make drafting less stressful not only by describing the
relationship of your ideas to each other and to the thesis or
question, but because you now have small manageable chunks to tackle
·
many
professors will be delighted to make an appointment with you to go
over an outline but not a draft
How to construct
your own
The first step to
constructing an outline is to take a deep breath. You're probably
intimidated by the research materials and notes amassed in front of
you --not to worry.
Carefully read the
notes you took from the last step. Try to find classifications for
your findings that relate to your thesis or research question. Look
for common trends. They're going to be separated from each other but
gather them together. It doesn't really matter how you classify. For a
5,000 word paper, you may find two huge headings. Great, now see what
could fall under each. And don't forget to look back at the original
assignment for clues about sub-groups your professor might be looking
for.
You can classify
using a variety of techniques. If you like putting notes on index
cards, then paper-clip ones that go together and shuffle them around
to achieve the best order of ideas. You can also do this on paper: use
different-coloured symbols or highlighters or cut your sheets into
strips (if you wrote on only one side of the page). On the computer,
use some of the techniques suggested by our OWL handout on Writing
With Computers.
With several piles
of related concepts before you, think of other ways of grouping that
might make equal sense.
Once you're happy
with what you've got, you may find that some sections are strong and
fleshed-out whereas others are weaker. Do some more research where
needed or see if two "weak" sections just couldn't fit under one
stronger heading. Perhaps as hard as
you
try, your points
fit together but not with the overarching argument you're making. In
that case, don't be afraid to re-evaluate your thesis; it may just
need a qualification. Your evidence may be great but if it supports a
different thesis, your readers won't see how great it is because
they'll be expecting something else.
Now that you have
thesis and support (or research question and answers) fitting
together, give yourself a pat on the backrb.the really hard work is
done!
What should an
outline look like?
It doesn't really
matter. Unless you have to hand it in for marks or you really do like
the process, don't feel you have to get bogged down in the formal,
"roman-numeral" structure. If webbing or point form does it for you,
then that's what you should use.
Check out this
possible template for an argumentative paper and this one for an
analytical paper. Remember that they are just possible structural
ideas. Now that you're an expert critical problem-solver, we're sure
you can modify them to suit the needs of your particular paper.
Plagiarism
Using someone
else's ideas or phrasing and representing those ideas or phrasing as
our own, either on purpose or through carelessness, is a serious
offense known as plagiarism. "Ideas or phrasing" includes written or
spoken material, of course - from whole papers and paragraphs to
sentences, and, indeed, phrases - but it also includes statistics, lab
results, art work, etc. "Someone else" can mean a professional source,
such as a published writer or critic in a book, magazine,
encyclopedia, or journal; an electronic resource such as material we
discover on the World Wide Web; another student at our school or
anywhere else; a paper-writing "service" (online or otherwise) which
offers to sell written papers for a fee.
Let us suppose, for
example, that we're doing a paper for Music Appreciation on the child
prodigy years of the composer and pianist Franz Liszt and that we've
read about the development of the young artist in several sources. In
Alan Walker's book Franz Liszt: The Virtuoso Years (Ithaca: 1983), we
read that Liszt's father encouraged him, at age six, to play the piano
from memory, to sight-read music and, above all, to improvise. We can
report in our paper (and in our own words) that Liszt was probably the
most gifted of the child prodigies making their mark in Europe in the
mid-nineteenth century - because that is the kind of information we
could have gotten from a number of sources; it has become what we call
common knowledge.
However, if we
report on the boy's father's role in the prodigy's development, we
should give proper credit to Alan Walker. We could write, for
instance, the following: Franz Liszt's father encouraged him, as early
as age six, to practice skills which later served him as an
internationally recognized prodigy (Walker 59). Or, we could write
something like this: Alan Walker notes that, under the tutelage of his
father, Franz Liszt began work in earnest on his piano playing at the
age of six (59). Not to give Walker credit for this important
information is plagiarism.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some More Examples
Here is our
original text from Elaine Tyler May's "Myths and Realities of the
American Family":
Because women's
wages often continue to reflect the fiction that men earn the family
wage, single mothers rarely earn enough to support themselves and
their children adequately. And because work is still organized around
the assumption that mothers stay home with children, even though few
mothers can afford to do so, child-care facilities in the United
States remain woefully inadequate.
Here are some
possible uses of this text. As you read through each version, try to
decide if it is a legitimate use of May's text or a plagiarism.
Version A:
Since women's wages
often continue to reflect the mistaken notion that men are the main
wage earners in the family, single mothers rarely make enough to
support themselves and their children very well. Also, because work is
still based on the assumption that mothers stay home with children,
facilities for child care remain woefully inadequate in the United
States.
Plagiarism In
Version A there is too much direct borrowing in sentence structure and
wording. The writer changes some words, drops one phrase, and adds
some new language, but the overall text closely resembles May's. Even
with a citation, the writer is still plagiarizing because the lack of
quotation marks indicates that Version A is a paraphrase, and should
thus be in the writer's own language.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Version
B:
As Elaine Tyler May
points out, "women's wages often continue to reflect the fiction that
men earn the family wage" (588). Thus many single mothers cannot
support themselves and their children adequately. Furthermore, since
work is based on the assumption that mothers stay home with children,
facilities for day care in this country are still "woefully
inadequate." (May 589).
Plagiarism The
writer now cites May, so we're closer to telling the truth about our
text's relationship to the source, but this text continues to borrow
too much language.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Version
C:
By and large, our
economy still operates on the mistaken notion that men are the main
breadwinners in the family. Thus, women continue to earn lower wages
than men. This means, in effect, that many single mothers cannot earn
a decent living. Furthermore, adequate day care is not available in
the United States because of the mistaken assumption that mothers
remain at home with their children.
Plagiarism Version
C shows good paraphrasing of wording and sentence structure, but May's
original ideas are not acknowledged. Some of May's points are common
knowledge (women earn less than men, many single mothers live in
poverty), but May uses this common knowledge to make a specific and
original point and her original conception of this idea is not
acknowledged.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Version
D:
Women today still
earn less than men - so much less that many single mothers and their
children live near or below the poverty line. Elaine Tyler May argues
that this situation stems in part from "the fiction that men earn the
family wage" (588). May further suggests that the American workplace
still operates on the assumption that mothers with children stay home
to care for them.
This assumption, in
my opinion, does not have the force it once did. More and more
businesses offer inhouse day-care facilities....
No Plagiarism The
writer makes use of the common knowledge in May's work, but
acknowledges May's original conclusion and does not try to pass it off
as his or her own. The quotation is properly cited, as is a later
paraphrase of another of May's ideas.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------Penalty
for Plagiarism
The penalty for
plagiarism is usually determined by the instructor teaching the course
involved. In many schools and colleges, it could involve failure for
the paper and it could mean failure for the entire course and even
expulsion from school. Ignorance of the rules about plagiarism is no
excuse, and carelessness is just as bad as purposeful violation. At
the very least, however, students who plagiarize have cheated
themselves out of the experience of being responsible members of the
academic community and have cheated their classmates by pretending to
contribute something original which is, in fact, a cheap copy. Within
schools and colleges that have a diverse student body, instructors
should be aware that some international students from other cultures
may have ideas about using outside resources that differ from the
institution's policies regarding plagiarism; opportunities should be
provided for all students to become familiar with institutional
policies regarding plagiarism.
Students who
do not thoroughly understand the concept of plagiarism and methods of
proper documentation should request assistance from their teacher and
from librarians.
Sample Works Cited
Works Cited
Anderson, J.
"Keats in Harlem." New Republic 204.14 (8 Apr. 1991): n. pag.
Online. EBSCO. 29 Dec. 1996.
Angier, Natalie.
"Chemists Learn Why Vegetables are Good for You." New York Times
13 Apr. 1993, late ed.: C1. New York Times Ondisc. CD-ROM.
UMI-Proquest. Oct. 1993.
Anzaldua, Gloria.
Borderlands/La Front era: The New Mestiza. San Francisco:
Spinsters/ Aunt Lute, 1987. Astin, Alexander W. Achieving
Educational Excellence. Washington: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
Burka, Lauren P.
"A Hypertext History of Multi-User Dimensions." MUD History.
URL:
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/lpb/mud-history.html
(5 Dec. 1994).
Christie, John S.
"Fathers and Virgins: Garcia Marquez's Faulknerian Chronicle of a
Death Foretold." Latin American Literary Review 13.3 (Fall 1993):
21-29.
Creation vs.
Evolution: "Battle of
the Classroom."
Videocassette. Dir. Ryall Wilson, PBS Video, 1982. (MLA) 58 min.
Darling, Charles.
"The Decadence: The 1890s." Humanities Division Lecture Series.
Capital CommunityTechnical College, Hartford. 12 Sept. 1996.
Feinberg, Joe.
"Freedom and Behavior Control." Encyclopedia of Bio-ethics, I,
93-101. (MLA) New York: Free Press, 1992.
Hennessy, Margot C.
"Listening to the Secret Mother: Reading J.E. Wideman's Brothers
and Keepers." American Women's Autobiography: Fea(s)ts of
Memory. Ed. Margo Culley. Madison, WI: U. Wisconsin Press, 1992.
302-314.
Jones, V.S., M.E.
Eakle, and C.W. Foerster. A History of Newspapers. Cambridge,
Eng.: Cambridge UP, 1987.
Metheny, N.M., and
W. D. Snively. Nurses' Handbook of Fluid Balance. Philadelphia:
Lippincott, 1967. "Money." Compton's Precyclopedia. 1977 ed.,
X, 80-91.
Mumford, Lewis.
The Highway and the City. New York: Harcourt Brace and World,
1963. -. Highways Around the World. New York: Prentice, 1967.
Orchestra. CD-ROM.
Burbank: Warner New Media. 1992.
Pepin, Ronald E.
Literature of Satire in the Twelfth Century. Lewiston:
Edwin Mellen Press, 1988.
Pikarsky, M. and
Christensen, D. Urban Transportation Policy and Management.
Boston: D.C. Heath, 1976. "The Political Problems of Arms-Treaty
Verification." Technology Review May/June 1986: 34-47. Redford,
Robert. Personal Interview. 24 Sept. 1996.
Schneider, Pamela.
Interview. Seniors: What Keeps Us Going. With Linda Storrow. Natl.
Public Radio. WNYC. New York. 11 July 1988.
Seabrook, Richard
H. C. "Community and Progress."
cybermind@jefferson.village. virginia.edu
(22 Jan. 1994).
Shaw, Webb.
"Professionals are Required to Report Abuse." Akron (Ohio) Beacon
Journal, Nov. 11, 1984